Alabama

  Litigation Lawyer.
HOME ABOUT US FAQ'S RESOURCES CONTACT US FREE CASE REVIEW
August 24, 2010
Litigation-Law
             
 
Selecting an attorney for legal cases is a very important decision. Please enter your information below to receive a Free Consultation from an attorney in your area:
 
Zip Code:   
 

Litigation News

 

SEC Charges Former Brocade CEO, Vice President And CFO

San Francisco, July 20, 2006 — The Securities and Exchange Commission today announced the filing of civil securities fraud charges against Gregory L. Reyes, the former CEO, President, and Chairman of Brocade Communications Systems, Inc., and Stephanie Jensen, its former Vice President of Human Resources, alleging that the two routinely backdated stock option grants to give employees favorably priced options without recording necessary compensation expenses. The action, which is among the first cases involving manipulation of stock option grants in violation of the federal securities laws, is the result of an 18-month investigation by the Commission.

According to the Commission’s complaint, Reyes, 43, of Saratoga, Calif., and Jensen, 48, of Los Altos, Calif., regularly caused Brocade to grant “in-the-money” options (i.e., the exercise price is below the stock’s market price on the day of grant, giving the recipient an immediate paper gain) to both new and current employees between 2000 and 2004, but backdated documents to make it appear that the options were “at-the-money” (i.e., the exercise price is the same as the stock’s market price on the day of the grant) when granted, thus concealing millions of dollars in expenses from investors. Under well-settled accounting principles applicable at the time, options granted “at-the-money” did not need to be expensed. In contrast, options granted “in-the-money” needed to be recorded as a compensation expense.

The complaint alleges that Reyes repeatedly used hindsight to select a date with a lower stock price from the recent past as the supposed option grant date. To facilitate the scheme, Jensen created, or directed others to create, paperwork making it appear that the options had been granted on the earlier date. In some instances, employment offer letters and compensation committee minutes were falsified and purported to document option grants to employees before they had even been hired by the company. As a result of this practice, Brocade was able to give employees “in-the-money” stock options without having to recognize compensation expenses as required by accounting rules. When these stock option abuses surfaced, Brocade was required to restate and revise its financial statements for fiscal years 1999 through 2004. In January 2005, Brocade announced the following restatements (fiscal years):

2004: Net loss increased from $2 million to $32 million
2003: Net loss increased from $136 million to $147 million
2002: Income increased by $60 million to $126 million
1999-2001: Income declined by a total of $304 million

The complaint also names Antonio Canova, Brocade’s former CFO, who is alleged to have learned of the backdating after joining Brocade. According to the complaint, Canova was specifically warned in writing that option paperwork had been forged to enable an employee to get favorably priced options; he took no action and failed to advise Brocade’s auditors and Audit Committee. The complaint alleges that despite this knowledge, Canova signed Brocade’s false and misleading financial statements and SEC filings.

The Commission’s complaint, filed in federal court in San Francisco, Calif., charges Reyes, Canova, and Jensen with fraud and other violations of the federal securities laws, including the books-and-records, internal controls, misrepresentations to auditors, and Sarbanes-Oxley certification provisions.

Contact our Alabama Litigation Lawyer Now!

 

 
Did You Know?    
 
 
There are alternatives to filing a lawsuit.
If you do not want to file a lawsuit, you may choose an alternative dispute resolution method. Alternative dispute resolution methods use mediation or arbitration instead of, or in addition to, the courts, to resolve a controversy. ADR methods are often faster, less traumatic, and less expensive than traditional litigation and can produce a better or fairer result.

 


  Newsroom  
 


News about Litigation cases in Alabama and nationwide:

Prop. 200 Federal District Court Hearing
Arguments Regarding Proof of Citizenship Requirement on Federal Voter Registration form “I was heartened by today's court proceeding in which the c...
Read more >


FTC Announces Workshops on Merger Investigation
Joseph J. Simons, Director of the Federal Trade Commission's Bureau of Competition, today announced a schedule and agenda for public workshops on m...
Read more >


More Litigation News >

 
 

Litigation Terms

 


Today's Terms

Exhibit

Definition:
Any document of object serving as evidence in court is called an exhibit.

Rebuttal

Definition:
Rebuttal entail the opposing evidence that is introduced to counter other testimonies or evidence.

Docket

Definition:
A docket is a collection or log of court proceedings.

More Litigation Terms >

 

Litigation Resources

 


Search Litigation resources in our resource center:

More Resources >

 

Litigation Hot Topics

 


Topics Related to Litigation:

  • Individual Disputes
  • Company Disputes
  • Institutional Diputes
  • Government Agency Disputes
  • Financial Litigation
  • Employment Litigation
  • Contract Litigation

More Litigation Topics >

Alabama Litigation-Law Attorney

 
If you live in the following cities and need an Litigation-Law attorney you should contact our Litigation-Law Attorney as soon as possible:

  • Alabaster
  • Albertville
  • Alexander City
  • Anniston
  • Athens
  • Atmore
  • Auburn
  • Bay Minette
  • Bessemer
  • Birmingham
  • Cullman
  • Daphne
  • Decatur
  • Dothan
  • Enterprise
  • Fairhope
  • Florence
  • Fort Payne
  • Gadsden
  • Hartselle
  • Huntsville
  • Madison
  • Mobile
  • Montgomery
  • Opelika
  • Ozark
  • Pelham
  • Phenix City
  • Pinson
  • Prattville
  • Selma
  • Sylacauga
  • Talladega
  • Theodore
  • Trussville
  • Tuscaloosa
  • Wetumpka
s
 


Legal Disclaimers
All attorney listings are a paid attorney advertisement, and do not in any way constitute a referral or endorsement by an approved or authorized lawyer referral service. The information provided on Alabama Litigation Lawyer.com is not intended to be legal advice, but merely conveys general information related to legal issues commonly encountered. Your access to and use of this website is subject to additional Terms and Conditions.

Local Professional? Generate new business today
Call 866-227-9356 or contact a sales rep


This site is part of the LawFirms.com Network
©2010 ExpertHub, wholly owned subsidiary of MoxyMedia, Inc.